Clonal Reproduction Is Not an Evolutionary Dead End

Clonal Reproduction Is Not an Evolutionary Dead End

EvoEcoSeminars via YouTube Direct link

Intro

1 of 31

1 of 31

Intro

Class Central Classrooms beta

YouTube playlists curated by Class Central.

Classroom Contents

Clonal Reproduction Is Not an Evolutionary Dead End

Automatically move to the next video in the Classroom when playback concludes

  1. 1 Intro
  2. 2 Clonal reproduction is not an evolutionary dead end
  3. 3 Clonal reproduction and modularity very widespread life history
  4. 4 Important terminology- genet vs. ramet (J.F. Harper 1977)
  5. 5 A role for genotypic - clonal diversity, replaces species level diversity in species- poor systems
  6. 6 Yet there are millenia-old clones in corals or seagrasses that dominate entire locations
  7. 7 A long-standing ecological riddle
  8. 8 Substantial somatic genetic variation among ramets of the same genet
  9. 9 What to we mean with a fixed SNP?
  10. 10 Genealogy and tree root can be reconstructed
  11. 11 How do we know that this is really a single clone = Benet?
  12. 12 How do these data compare to recent full genome oak studies?
  13. 13 Evolving microbial culture, orange genotype sweeps to fixation
  14. 14 Unitary vs. modular species
  15. 15 Somatic mutations always enterramets as mosaic genetic variation
  16. 16 Proliferating cell population in plants - apical meristem, their genotype determines entire plant
  17. 17 Seagrass data:pronounced modes in allele frequency distribution
  18. 18 Modes of low frequency variants reflect subfixation in stratified meristematic tissue
  19. 19 Evidence for somatic genetic drift: low-frequency variants to rise to fixation consistent with ramet topology
  20. 20 Quick summary
  21. 21 Perspective: can the somatic genetic variation contribute to adaptation?
  22. 22 Challenge #1: mutations need to be partially dominant to be visible to selection in diploids in
  23. 23 Evolutionary pathways with and without sex
  24. 24 But empirical data show appreciable and often similarly rapid adaptation under sexual vs. asexual propagation
  25. 25 What is the evidence that somatic mutations may confer phenotypic variation?
  26. 26 What is the evidence that somatic genetic variation may confer phenotypic variation?
  27. 27 challenge #3: causal polymorphisms difficult to detect since genetic hitchhiking is pervasive (-entire genome linkage group)
  28. 28 Cancer evolutionary biology is facing the same analogous issue what are the casual driver mutations?
  29. 29 Some methods from detecting adaptive dynamics from cancer can be applied to detecting positive selection in modular species
  30. 30 How does the somatically generated variation compare to variation owing to recombination?
  31. 31 Clone members - ramets and concepts of individuality revisited

Never Stop Learning.

Get personalized course recommendations, track subjects and courses with reminders, and more.

Someone learning on their laptop while sitting on the floor.